Skip to main content

Blog Week 3: Expert Commentary, Expert Testimony, Academic Fields

Regardless of the issue being discussed, it sure seems like Economics and Political Science have been the most thoroughly represented disciplines in the media, at least since 2008 and the Great Recession. It’s hard to blame the media for such a focus because it seems like that’s what most viewers want to hear about.  Of course the financial health of the country and its citizens will always be a hot topic, and between the auto industry’s near collapse, the banking/mortgage fiasco, and subsequent high unemployment levels all coinciding with the beginning of Obama’s presidency, the media always had relevant economic news to cover. And since the government became heavily involved in each of those crises, political commentary proved of equal interest.  Add to that the partisan shenanigans that exploded with Obama’s presidency, which have shown no signs of slowing down, and the media continues to have persistent political news to cover and analyze by bringing on political intellectuals. I do see historians taking part in conversations, at least during election seasons and occasionally at other times as well, but other disciplines deserve more coverage.

Receiving short shrift, at least by some of the heavy hitters (CNN, Fox, MSNBC) are the academic disciplines of Sociology and Psychology.  Think about issues related to public education, immigration, unemployment, the mortgage crisis, gender and race, addiction, and the recent election. They all have sociological and psychological origins and implications, yet when they are discussed in the media, it’s usually in the context of the economy and/or the political landscape (exceptions for me are NPR and PBS.  I can't speak for a lot of other media outlets). What a shame. If the general public could be provided with more education about these issues by professional commentary by sociologists and psychologists, perhaps there would be an increase in empathy, compassion, and acceptance of others and less of a selfish how does this issue affect me attitude.  


Very generally speaking, the media has become more diverse in terms of who provides commentary.  We've definitely moved beyond turning on the news to see only distinquished white men.  However, the perspectives of the majority of commentators in the media do not seem particularly diverse and are deeply partisan.  Far-leaning right and left commentators are over-represented.  That’s one of the reasons why I do appreciate the people at NPR and PBS so much.  Their commentators may have political leanings, but they still acknowledge and respect the opinions of one another. Perspectives that are under-represented are any that are not politically motivated, and they may even be actively scorned.  Of course whether or not any disciplines are scorned could depend on a particular news outlet, due to its own biased coverage.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Empathy: Read It. Live It.

Scout Finch was one lucky little girl.  The wisdom bestowed upon her by Atticus surely helped her navigate through some very trying times. But Scout and her brother Jem aren’t the only people to learn from Atticus’ advice and life lessons.  Anyone who reads To Kill a Mockingbird learns the importance of one of life’s most valuable soft skills: empathy, the ability to understand and share the feelings and emotions of others. My job as a high school English teacher entails working with students to become better communicators through reading, writing, speaking, and listening.  But studying and discussing literature can do so much more. It’s vital that young people today develop empathy towards others in order to combat the polarization, discrimination, and intolerance currently at play in society.  The study of literature and the lessons it imparts can help build empathy in our leaders of tomorrow. Recent studies on empathy have shown alarming results.  Fo...

Blog #4 Polarization

The rise of the “newer formats” was followed by the 2000 presidential election, so the environment was ripe for a more extreme political polarization to infect the country. It does seem like there has been a loss of mutual respect between opposing ideologies along with a reluctance to engage in civil discourse over pressing issues of the day. The word “compromise” has been forgotten by so many political pundits, and that has seemed to rub off on audiences.  When both sides are always in attack mode while simultaneously digging in their heels to promote their own agenda, it would appear unlikely that any real progress may be made.  With that being said, I do believe that this kind of programming has engaged a greater number of people, which can be good for democracy.  The entertainment value of the shows may be what initially increased viewership, but the result is more people watching and therefore learning about current affairs.  Certainly that can be consider...

Blog Prompt: From Nobody to Somebody

Except for the last chapter, Hill does indeed paint a bleak picture regarding the future for so many of our citizens. I must admit that after reading the book, my first reactions were of disgust and despair. How are the people who suffer from these State-sponsored hurdles supposed to break free of them in order to experience a safe and more rewarding life? The first two areas I’d like to see addressed are education, our police forces, and the prison system. I suggested in one of my op-eds that larger, diverse high schools should organize into a variety of learning academies to better prepare students for college and career, but the benefits of such a setting go beyond career potential.   So many students lack a stable, loving home environment.   In my years teaching I have found that a lack of family support is possibly the biggest cause of student failure. The academy model directly addresses the problem because the students matriculate together and oftentimes have the...