Regardless of the issue being discussed, it sure seems
like Economics and Political Science have been the most thoroughly represented disciplines
in the media, at least since 2008 and the Great Recession. It’s hard to blame
the media for such a focus because it seems like that’s what most viewers want
to hear about. Of course the financial
health of the country and its citizens will always be a hot topic, and between
the auto industry’s near collapse, the banking/mortgage fiasco, and subsequent
high unemployment levels all coinciding with the beginning of Obama’s
presidency, the media always had relevant economic news to cover. And since the
government became heavily involved in each of those crises, political commentary
proved of equal interest. Add to that
the partisan shenanigans that exploded with Obama’s presidency, which have
shown no signs of slowing down, and the media continues to have persistent
political news to cover and analyze by bringing on political intellectuals. I
do see historians taking part in conversations, at least during election
seasons and occasionally at other times as well, but other disciplines deserve
more coverage.
Receiving short shrift, at least by some of the heavy
hitters (CNN, Fox, MSNBC) are the academic disciplines of Sociology and
Psychology. Think about issues related
to public education, immigration, unemployment, the mortgage crisis, gender and
race, addiction, and the recent election. They all have sociological and psychological origins and implications,
yet when they are discussed in the media, it’s usually in the context of the
economy and/or the political landscape (exceptions for me are NPR and PBS. I can't speak for a lot of other media outlets). What a shame. If the general public
could be provided with more education about these issues by professional
commentary by sociologists and psychologists, perhaps there would be an
increase in empathy, compassion, and acceptance of others and less of a selfish
how does this issue affect me attitude.
Very generally speaking, the media has become more diverse in terms of who provides commentary. We've definitely moved beyond turning on the news to see only distinquished white men. However, the perspectives of the
majority of commentators in the media do not seem particularly diverse and are
deeply partisan. Far-leaning right and
left commentators are over-represented. That’s
one of the reasons why I do appreciate the people at NPR and PBS so much. Their commentators may have political
leanings, but they still acknowledge and respect the opinions of one another.
Perspectives that are under-represented are any that are not politically
motivated, and they may even be actively scorned. Of course whether or not any disciplines are scorned could depend on a particular news outlet, due to its own biased coverage.
Comments
Post a Comment